Français | English
La servitude volontaire

La servitude volontaire

Postérité, réappropriations et perspectives critiques

Edited by Jacques-Louis Lantoine, Camille Chevalier

La croisée des chemins



Voluntary Servitude
Posterity, Reappropriations and Critical Perspectives

"Voluntary servitude" is a formula used in the academic field as well as in the intellectual or journalistic fields. Its applications, which sometimes refer to the Discourse of the voluntary servitude by La Boétie and are rarely based on a precise reading of this text, claim to locate the source of domination in the free consent of those subjected. Nevertheless, this oxymoronic, almost provocative formula obliterates the true causes of this apparent will to serve. Explaining the phenomenon in terms of desire, habits, consented submission, symbolic domination, obsequium or pleasure in serving may enlighten what seems otherwise monstrous and enigmatic. Studies about the working world show that analyses in terms of voluntary servitude are not the most appropriate. Finally, while such a formula may raise awareness, it doesn't provide the key to emancipation.

Jacques-Louis Lantoine
lien IdRef : 196884217


Jacques-Louis Lantoine, Pierre-François Moreau
L'intelligence de la pratique
The Intelligence of Practice
Le concept de disposition chez Spinoza
The Concept of Disposition in Spinoza
La croisée des chemins
Unlike traditional and contemporary approches of dispositions, the philosophy of Spinoza proposes a deterministic and actualist definition. This book highlights the originality of this definition and shows that the concept is crucial for the philosophy of practice and anthropology of Spinoza.


Contributions:

Marine Bedon, Jacques-Louis Lantoine
L'homme et la brute au XVIIe siècle
Human and brute in 17th century.
Une éthique animale à l'âge classique ?
An animal ethics in early modern philosophy?
La croisée des chemins
The book questions the representations, debates and arguments supported by the authors of the 17th century about the relationship between men and beasts, also called "brutes" at that time. No animal ethics appears in their writings, but this absence cannot be related to the mere expression of irrational prejudices.