ENS ÉDITIONS
onixsuitesupport@onixsuite.com
20240328T2258Z
fre
COM.ONIXSUITE.9782847885828
03
01
ENS Éditions
02
284788582X
03
9782847885828
15
9782847885828
00
BC
21
01
9.06
in
02
5.91
in
01
23
cm
02
15
cm
FR
10
02
27
01
02
Tracés
Revue de Sciences humaines
01
01
Numéro 27
Tracés, n°27/2014
Penser avec le droit
1
B01
01
Onixsuite Contributor ID
6826
38
15155773X
Guillaume Calafat
Calafat, Guillaume
Guillaume
Calafat
2
B01
01
Onixsuite Contributor ID
5843
38
14292704X
Arnaud Fossier
Fossier, Arnaud
Arnaud
Fossier
3
B01
01
Onixsuite Contributor ID
6951
38
179751565
Pierre Thévenin
Thévenin, Pierre
Pierre
Thévenin
4
B17
01
Onixsuite Contributor ID
5835
38
127335773
Paul Costey
Costey, Paul
Paul
Costey
5
B17
01
Onixsuite Contributor ID
5843
38
14292704X
Arnaud Fossier
Fossier, Arnaud
Arnaud
Fossier
1
01
fre
20
Droit; Justice; Sciences sociales; sociologie
22
00
03
00
<p>Volontiers entretenu par les juristes, le postulat de l'autonomie du droit et de son « isolement » absolu vis-à-vis du monde social, a longtemps dissuadé les sciences humaines d'appréhender la pensée juridique pour elle-même. Inversement, les facultés de droit – en France tout particulièrement – se montraient d’ordinaire réticentes à intégrer les apports de la sociologie, de l’anthropologie ou de l’historiographie dans leurs cursus. Depuis une vingtaine d’années environ, on assiste à de sensibles évolutions, qui voient les sciences sociales s’aventurer franchement sur le terrain du droit et prendre en charge des questions qui touchent aussi bien aux usages du droit qu’à son fonctionnement spécifique et technique.<br />
En offrant un aperçu de cette reconfiguration actuelle des rapports entre droit et sciences sociales, ce numéro laisse entrevoir quelques dynamiques et chantiers de recherches prometteurs. Plusieurs contributions pointent la manière dont la pensée critique a pu s’enrichir en envisageant le droit non plus comme un simple instrument de domination, mais bien plutôt comme une ressource mobilisable pour qualifier, analyser et contester une situation. D’autres montrent que ce changement de perspective s’accompagne d’une meilleure maîtrise, par les sciences sociales, des opérations du droit (fiction, qualification, etc.) et des spécificités du raisonnement juridique.<br />
Pour mieux saisir le droit, il semble dès lors utile, d’une part, de réconcilier ses usages politiques avec l’analyse de l’outillage technique et formalisé des juristes ; d’autre part, de mieux distinguer les différentes formes de normativité, autrement dit de faire l’histoire comparée du concept et des mutations du droit.</p>
02
00
Depuis une vingtaine d'années environ, on assiste à de sensibles évolutions, qui voient les sciences sociales s'aventurer franchement sur le terrain du droit et prendre en charge des questions qui touchent aussi bien aux usages du droit qu’à son fonctionnement spécifique et technique.
03
00
<p><strong> How sociology can unfold the law</strong></p>
<p>If sociology studies the law, it should focus on its production patterns, on the legal text itself, and on practices – contrary to theories which defend the autonomy of the law, or which study the field of legal professionals. Such a position compels the sociologist to be critical, and to conduct research on issues of which law is only one aspect. Demonstration will be based on three cases : fight against "cults" in France, treatment of dead bodies, and intellectual property.</p>
<p><strong>Coping by law with digital uncertainty : “Failure to secure” as infringement in Hadop</strong>i</p>
<p>The creation and implementation of the Haute Autorité pour la diffusion des œuvres et la protection des droits sur Internet (High Authority for the diffusion of works and the protection of rights on the Internet, or Hadopi) is an occasion to observe the extent to which copyright is a performative system. The French legislator, to cope with the steady rise of downloads of copyright-protected digital content, attempts to fill “by law” the gap opened by the digital (r)evolution in the general anti-counterfeiting regime. This article follows the attempts to reconcile several conflicting dynamics – metrological frailties, difficulties of definition, diversity of infractions. Ultimately, a newly-created infraction, defined by unprecedented legal, material and moral components, provides a reference point allowing to restore – albeit tentatively – the authority of law on undefinable, unseizable objects, by defining as infringement the “failure to secure” one's Internet connection.</p>
<p><strong> Is it possible to transcend the Civil Code ? On the legal controversies concerning war damages (1914-1919)</strong></p>
<p>The <em>Charte du sinistré</em>, enacted on 17 April 1919, was the legal framework for the reconstruction of properties and goods damaged in France during World War I. Its elaboration led to heated controversies among French legal scholars on the modalities of providing war reparation, which addressed the definition of what law is or ought to be. Does it constitute a unique and stable model shaped by the Civil Code, or does it allow for some innovation and creation of new rules ? This study shows the different conceptions of law defended by legal scholars and the controversies arising due to the desire to transcend the Civil Code. It also discusses the social effects of the technical expertise promoted by the jurists.</p>
<p><strong>The code as a practical accomplishment : an ethnomethodological respecification and an Egyptian case study</strong></p>
<p>The study of law is conceptual : it deals with the grammar of the concept of law in the whole range of its usages and practices. This paper illustrates this point from the perspective of the code. It insists on the necessity not to lose the fundamental phenomenon which has to be treated when addressing codified laws, that is, the practice of codifying and of referring to the code. It means to observe and describe the people’s practical orientations to what they identify as a code, their way of making reference to, use, follow, manipulate, substantiate, or invoke it. This cannot be achieved but through the detailed examination and description of the situated circumstances within which the participants to a legal or judicial process make the code relevant for their own practical purposes.</p>
<p><strong>The invention of law in the West. Reading Aldo Schiavone</strong></p>
<p> This book review focuses on Aldo Schiavone’s <em>Ius.</em> <em>L’invenzione del diritto in Occidente</em>. It considers, at first, the French translation of the book and the problems raised by the notion of <em>disciplinamento</em>, which is essential in the author’s view, and which is badly translated. In a second time, the review presents the evolution of the law in Rome, as conceived by Schiavone. According to him, <em>ius</em> is a stabilizing answer, which allowed to discipline a society and to help it to endure in a hostile environment. The history of the <em>ius</em> then appears as the progressive isolation of an autonomous legal function in the Roman society, in particular through the shift towards the abstraction that occurred at the turning point between Republic and Empire. That shift in a legal formalism definitely isolated the <em>ius</em> in an independent legal sphere, which constitutes Rome’s most important legacy to the West.</p>
<p><strong>How does law make equality real ? Comparison between French and American sociology of anti-discrimination law</strong></p>
<p>This article is a comparison between French and American sociology of non-discrimination law and their assessments about its capacity to make equality. Three aspects are analyzed : the capacity of law to qualify discrimination facts, to heal victims of discrimination and to modify power balance between minorities and majority. In France and in the USA, researches are globally skeptical about the power of law. But American researches are less radical and more ambivalent and pragmatic. The historical experiences and the legal traditions can explain this difference.</p>
<p><strong>Gender and judging, confronting law and gender studies</strong></p>
<p>This essay provides an overview of an emerging field of research in law and social sciences. Under the heading “gender and judging”, this new approach raises several issues such as the feminization of the judiciary, gender-based differences in sentencing, and the reproduction of gender norms in justice system.</p>
<p><strong>Human rights : a borderline case for legal positivism</strong></p>
<p>
<p>The tradition of legal positivism was rather reluctant towards the important taken by the abstract and pre-legal notion of “right” in political and social discourse. But the situation started to change after the Second World War, and, even more, in the 1960s, when “human rights” imposed themselves within a variety of discourses. In order to respond to this new state of affairs, Joseph Raz proposed an original reading of human rights, understood as being “without foundations”. This article presents Raz’s positions, on rights, and, subsequently, on human rights. These two stages of the presentation lead to a critical evaluation of the proposed theory. Indeed, the general theory of law advanced by Raz, as well as his more specific work on human rights, present themselves as going beyond the classical division between iusnaturalism and legal positivism. This article argues that, even if this position is intellectually stimulating, the distinction remains relevant and deserves to be defended, in particular in thinking about the human rights.</p>
</p>
<p><strong>Law as a discourse, Law as an apparatus</strong></p>
<p>This paper gives a commentary on a book entitled <em>L’ordre juridique et le discours du droit. Essai sur les limites de la connaissance du droit</em> (The legal order and the legal discourse. Essay on the limits of law understanding) written by a French Professor in Law, Rémy Libchaber (Paris, LGDJ, 2013). It exposes, with inevitably personal viewpoint, some key elements of an original definition of the Law. Trying to propose something different from positivist or naturalist theories and to reconciliate theory and practice, Rémy Libchaber develops the idea of the Law as a discourse and the Legal order as device allowing the production of this discourse. He adds a cultural conception of the Law which opens interesting avenues worth exploring. This presentation leads to critical interrogations. What reveals such a publication about what is going on in French universities of Law ? Does the definition proposed constitute a federative project or a marginal thesis ? Despite of its seduction, some indications lead to seriously doubt the paradigmatic vocation of the new suggested frame for thought.</p>
<p><strong>John Dewey and legal theory and philosophy of law</strong></p>
<p>In 1941, John Dewey contributed to a conference at Northwestern University where he presented his “philosophy of law”, along with law professors and another philosopher. The commentary of this short text allows us to develop several lines of thought, in sociology as well as in philosophy of law, exploring new and promising areas for research in law and justice inspired by pragmatist philosophy. By opening up empirical research programs and by questioning internal and normative approaches to law, Dewey invites us to consider “Law” as a fully social process, against lawyers’ traditional views.</p>
<p></p>
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" />
<p></p>
03
02
<p>
Depuis une vingtaine d'années environ, on assiste à de sensibles évolutions, qui voient les sciences sociales s’aventurer franchement sur le terrain du droit et prendre en charge des questions qui touchent aussi bien aux usages du droit qu’à son fonctionnement spécifique et technique.<br />
En offrant un aperçu de cette reconfiguration actuelle des rapports entre droit et sciences sociales, ce numéro laisse entrevoir quelques dynamiques et chantiers de recherches prometteurs. Plusieurs contributions pointent la manière dont la pensée critique a pu s’enrichir en envisageant le droit non plus comme un simple instrument de domination, mais bien plutôt comme une ressource mobilisable pour qualifier, analyser et contester une situation.</p>
04
00
<p><strong>Éditorial</strong><br />
Droit et sciences sociales : les espaces d'un rapprochement<br />
Par Guillaume Calafat, Arnaud Fossier et Pierre Thévenin</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong><br />
Comment la sociologie peut déplier le droit<br />
Par Arnaud Esquerre<br />
Le droit comme gestion de l'incertitude. L'infraction de « défaut de sécurisation » dans Hadopi<br />
Par Francesca Musiani et Pierre Gueydier<br />
Peut-on dépasser le droit civil ? Les controverses juridiques autour de la réparation des dommages de guerre (1914-1919)<br />
Par Guillaume Richard<br />
Le code en tant qu'accomplissement pratique. Respécification ethnométhodologique et cas d'étude égyptien<br />
Par Baudouin Dupret</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong><br />
L'invention du droit en Occident. Une lecture d'Aldo Schiavone.<br />
Par Thibaud Lanfranchi<br />
Le droit au service de l'égalité ? Comparaison des sociologies du droit de la non-discrimination française et états-unienne<br />
Par Vincent-Arnaud Chappe<br />
Gender and judging, ou le droit à l'épreuve des études de genre<br />
Par Arthur Vuattoux<br />
Les droits de l'homme : un cas limite pour le positivisme juridique<br />
Par Anna Zielinska<br />
Du droit comme discours et comme dispositif. À propos de Rémy Libchaber, L’ordre juridique et le discours du droit<br />
Par Sonia Desmoulin-Canselier<br />
John Dewey et l’expérience du droit. La philosophie juridique à l’épreuve du pragmatisme<br />
Par Liora Israël et Jean Grosdidier</p>
<p><strong>Traductions</strong><br />
Gouvernement-manageur et citoyens-consommateurs. Le cas du Criminal Justice Act 1991<br />
Nicola Lacey<br />
(entretien introductif et traduction : Pierre Thévenin)<br />
Indisponibilité, service public, usage. Trois concepts fondamentaux pour le « commun » et les « biens communs »<br />
Paolo Napoli<br />
(traduction : Arnaud Fossier ; introduction : Michele Spanò)</p>
<p><strong>Entretien</strong><br />
Le droit en situation<br />
Entretien avec Pierre Lascoumes<br />
Par Guillaume Calafat et Arnaud Fossier</p>
<p> </p>
16
00
Tracés est une revue de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales à vocation interdisciplinaire, publiant deux numéros thématiques par an et des hors-série.
16
00
This multi-disciplinary journal on research in the social sciences claims a true pluralism, as attested to by the variety of themes and approaches it publishes.
17
00
<p><em>Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines</em> est une revue de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales, publiant deux numéros thématiques par an et des hors-série. Ces numéros rendent compte d'un débat ancien qui a pris un tour nouveau en raison de l'actualité éditoriale ou politique, soumettent à une interrogation croisée une notion que les multiples traditions intellectuelles et disciplinaires abordent habituellement en ordre dispersé, ou explorent un champ de réflexion émergeant. Tracés revendique un véritable pluralisme, dont témoigne la variété des thèmes et des approches publiés. Le comité de rédaction de la revue, composé de jeunes chercheurs issus de diverses disciplines poursuit un projet interdisciplinaire fort, qui se traduit notamment dans le choix des articles, notes, traductions et entretiens composant chacun des numéros.</p> <p><!--StartFragment--><strong>Revue soutenue par l'Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales du CNRS.</strong><!--EndFragment--></p> <p>Retrouvez <em>Tracés</em> sur <u><strong><a href="http://traces.revues.org/">Revues.org</a></strong></u></p>
17
00
<p><em>Tracés: Revue de Sciences Humaines</em> publishes research in the social sciences in two themed issues per year and a handful of special editions. These issues focus on an old debate that has taken a new turn due to current editorial or political circumstances, takes an idea that the various intellectual traditions and disciplines would usually address in isolation and submits it to examination from multiple perspectives, or explores an emerging field of thought. Tracés claims a true pluralism, as attested to by the variety of themes and approaches it publishes. The journal's editorial committee is made up of young researchers from various disciplines and pursues a strong interdisciplinary project. This is manifested in the selection of articles, notes, translations, and interviews that make up each of the issues.</p>
01
00
03
02
01
D502
02
192
03
125
06
f473a5a7a185ddfd6be0063db0e6e694
07
7396
http://catalogue-editions.ens-lyon.fr/resources/titles/29021100635720/images/0b9b6d6d154e98ce34b3f2e4ef76eae9/THUMBNAIL/9782847885828.jpg
17
20160220T2011Z
15
00
04
02
Avis de parution
02
01
E107
07
67066000
http://catalogue-editions.ens-lyon.fr/resources/titles/29021100635720/extras/Traces27_mail.pdf
01
01
Dilicom
ENS Lyon
06
3052305680019
ENS Éditions
Lyon
FR
02
ENS Éditions
Véronique Raynaud veronique.raynaud@ens-lyon.fr
01
20141124
11
20141124
01
WORLD
02
01
GCOI
29021100635720
27
03
9782847885835
FR
00
06
06
3012262710000
CID - Fondation MSH Distribution
+33(0)153485630
+33(0)53482095
cid@msh-paris.fr
33
www.cid-difusion.fr
http://www.cid-difusion.fr
29
http://www.cid-difusion.fr
01 1
20
04
02
15.00
01
R
5.50
14.22
0.78
EUR